I attempted to resign today. I hadn't intended to do it until tomorrow, when I could get my two bosses together and lessen the trauma for myself, but it occurred to me that it would not be good form for the HR department to receive a request for a reference when I've not told them I'm leaving. That wouldn't be the best way for the news to be broken to them.
So, in the absence of A, I gave F the option of talking about an undisclosed subject today, or waiting until tomorrow when A was around. She chose today. It did not go well in that it seemed that F was as close to crying as I've ever seen her get, but she seemed supportive enough. I explained my reasons for going and although I was asked if there was anything they could do to get me to stay, I said that there wasn't. The company just wasn't the place for my future plans to be carried out.
I told D, who as a man, was definately not as upset by the news, but equally as disappointed. He had already guessed, having walked past F's room and seeing the door shut with the two of us talking, that something serious was going on.
Little over an hour later I took the letter into F, but she had more to say. She'd been speaking to the Dark One (the chief executive) and they'd both agreed that they didn't want to lose me. But, they didn't really have much of an idea how to keep me. On the salary basis, I explained what I'd be getting in my new job and F believed they could match it. But, she didn't think they could match the benefits. She suggested moving more towards formalities (with an associated pay rise of up to £10-15k) but it's not really the direction I want to be heading in. They'd thought of adding extra duties around IT liasion which would ceratinly be interesting, but didn't really have an idea of what they'd want done or what they'd be trying to achieve. It also seemed clear that they didn't have a too much of an idea of how IT deparments tend to function outside of the company. The problems they feel we're facing seem to me to be general problems with any IT system, and not necessarily specific to the company, and whilst I believe I could be of some use in that area, my lack of 'real' IT experience would probably render it a non-starter in terms of expanding my role. Other than that, while they were open to ideas on how to expand my role, they didn't really have any ideas on how to go about doing so themselves, and I can't really think of anything myself. In terms of what I'd want to do within the company, I would look at becoming PA to the CEO. It seems to me that her role has the right mix of duties, and the excitement of being higher up the ranks and really someone that can help in the day to day workings of the company rather than just another cog in the machine. However, a role like that would be impossible to create within the London office.
I also pointed out that being a very small office (at least within London), I would be very wary of stepping on people's toes in the pursuit of my own career progression. In terms of stepping over people, I feel it's easier to do so in a larger company, where there are more people competing for progression, better jobs and better pay packets. Although I'm not supposed to know (and won't detail how I do), I know about E's mini-promotion and was somewhat put out that it went to her without even consideration for myself. Even despite the fact that I wouldn't want her extra duties, turning her more into a host/secretary rather than just a secretary. What I do know though, is any progression on my part would put bad blood between us, and in an office over less than 20 people, bad blood is not a good way to work.
Apparently E already harbours negative feelings towards me because of the autonomy in the way I work; that I can pick something (technically simple) up that hasn't been touched by an attorney and have it pretty much ready to go to its relevant patent office before being seen by someone qualified; that I so quickly tuned in to the way each individual person works (even those that I don't work for) that I can pull out necessary jobs to take off their hands; even just that I generally work quickly and don't mess around in getting things done. In making myself indipensible to some people I've raised the game among the secretaries in the office, I'#ve made it that much more difficult for others to excel.
At that point, we left it that I would think about things overnight. But it hasn't taken me that long to come to a conclusion.
Regardless of how the company would manage to expand my duties, the novelty wouldn't last. I master things too easily, and get bored even more easily. It seems that in six to twelve months, maybe more, maybe less, I would outgrow those duties and we'd be back to square one again. There can only be so many times that we would go through the process before running out of ideas and new ways of keeping me happy and in one place. At this point it doesn't seem fair either to myself or to the company to keep on in that manner. At some point I would inevitably be ready to leave again, at which point they would be left with a role that would be difficult to fill, having been tailored to a specific person and that person's need. Instead, in leaving them now, I leave them with a post that's standard and easier to fill. And as for me, I think in leaving now, I can move into a role where I can grow with the company and train in ways I wouldn't be able to in my current or 'grown' position.
